CASE
The family of a 23-year old female patient, attached to a respirator for the past three months and in a comatose state, decides whether to discontinue the respirator’s use. They fully understand the patient’s situation, and that ethically speaking (assuming the patient is in fact entering the dying stage), withdrawing the respirator proves acceptable if it offers no reasonable hope for recovery (a fact that the doctors confirm), or if the burden proves excessive.
However, they seek more clarification regarding the concept of burden.
QUESTION
When contemplating withholding or withdrawing certain medical procedures, what kind of and whose burden should be considered?
POSSIBLE SOLUTION
Burden factors into decision-making involving complex topics, such as withholding or withdrawing life support, ordinary and extraordinary means, and the no-CPR or DNR policy (discussed in other issues of Bioethics Digest).
Burden manifests differently – physical, psychological, emotional, financial, spiritual, social, or in terms of spent time, efforts and resources. Too much burden includes, for example, undergoing a treatment extremely strenuous for a person advanced in age. Or it could mean having to sell one’s only house to pay for treatment, leaving the entire family homeless.
Burden also demands examination regarding the different persons involved – the patient, the family or people supporting the patient, and society as a whole. Thus, even though burden no longer presents a question for a patient who permanently lost consciousness (e.g., in a persistent vegetative state), it still merits consideration as it affects those giving care.
Regarding burden to society, a particular issue involves the allocation of scarce resources: even though the dying patient’s family can afford certain scarce resources (e.g., certain limited instruments in a small hospital), what if other patients with more hope of recovery also need them? The family should also take this into account when making the decision.
DISCLAIMER AS TO SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: These materials, including the original text (by the Author) and the AI-generated video content (via Google’s NotebookLM), are provided solely for educational and illustrative purposes. They present hypothetical scenarios (even though the AI-generated videos at times mistakenly say they took place in real life)and must not be construed as professional advice or a basis for operational or medical decision-making. Users are explicitly advised to seek the counsel of qualified experts and relevant bioethics committees for the proper assessment and determination of appropriate actions. The Author disclaims all liability for any loss or damage arising from the interpretation or application of these materials.
Copyright (C) 2025 by Author: Fr. Gregory Ramon D. GASTON, SThD, DComm. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No reproduction, transmission, or distribution of this content may be made without the explicit written permission of the author.